Lance Java wrote > > The J2EE specification states that you should never read or write to the > local file system. Using the local file system raises many issues > including > security, portability, transactions, clustering and thread safety. I don't > really agree with including a FileAssetFactory in the Tapestry source as > this would encourage people to do what I consider to be the wrong thing. > Is > there any chance you could use a BLOB in a database or some other more > scalable solution? >
So what would you choice be? I know that no database manifacture actually recommend to store the files into DB. Say that you have huge files, or a lot of them and your db is on another server, it is a lot of mess. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/File-System-Asset-Factory-help-needed-and-petition-wanted-tp5641308p5645266.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
