Kalle Korhonen-2 wrote
> 
> Could you just inject an object with @Autobuild to your service? You'd
> get one per service it's used in but the object itself wouldn't be
> available as a service.
> 
Thank you! Maybe we could use that.


Kalle Korhonen-2 wrote
> 
> If you really needed, you could use static
> protected or static package private operations to synchronize state.
> 
I don't understand what you mean here. Can you explain it?

--
View this message in context: 
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-to-define-a-private-service-a-service-only-for-another-service-tp5597443p5598131.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to