@Chris: thanks again and sorry for my tone of sharpness regarding the
community activity.
I watched JSON technics. As far as I got it, it is just a container to keep
your data, like a hash. So what is advantages to use it instead of
'renderSupport.addScript(js);' where I constructed the js function and
passed the translated Strings. In case of JSON, I would do the same, i.e.
passe the same values to JSON object as key-value pairs.
Something like that:
myString = new JSONObject().put("some_key",
messages.get("app.some.key")).toString();
The only difference I see for the moment is just I would pass JSON object to
my Jaavscript function instead of passing all the translations. But in the
Javascript function I should do the same, - get the translations back.
Am I right ? Or I got it wrong?
Thks
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/inject-i18-text-in-javascript-variables-jQuery-tp5094388p5097512.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
