As a new Tapestry user with no legacy code whatsoever… +1 ;-)
- hugi On 14.12.2011, at 18:30, Lenny Primak wrote: > I would say it's better to favor better functionality rather than backwards > compatibility in this case. > > On Dec 14, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > >> We are currently caught between the wrong technology (PrototypeJS) and >> the need for backwards compatibility. I'm not sure how that will play >> out in 5.4 but it will (finally!) be addressed. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
