Looks interesting, and I do think a mixin is a good way to go here.
 However, I'm trying to think of a case where multiple submits would be
permissible.  If there is no such case, perhaps it would be ideal for this
to be handled naively by Tapestry.  Has there been any discussion along
these lines?

2011/11/21 François Facon <francois.fa...@atos.net>

> Nice Work Lenny.
>
> I just discovered your mixin
>
> http://code.google.com/p/flowlogix/source/browse/services/src/main/java/com/flowlogix/web/mixins/DisableAfterSubmit.java
>
> And his related prototype file
>
> http://code.google.com/p/flowlogix/source/browse/services/src/main/resources/com/flowlogix/web/mixins/DisableAfterSubmit.js
>
>
>
> 2011/11/21 Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>:
> > Perhaps there are better solutions, but I solved it via
> DisableAfterSubmit mixin in my FlowLogix utility module
> http://code.google.com/p/flowlogix/
> >
> > On Nov 21, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Ray Nicholus <rnicho...@widen.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm sure I am not the first one to encounter this problem, and before I
> go
> >> about re-inventing the wheel, I wanted to see if this is something that
> has
> >> already been elegantly solved in the tapestry circle.  Anyone?
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to