Uh, yes. It's been a trying afternoon.

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You mean 5.3-rc-2 I suppose.
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> FYI: I found a minor problem in Tapestry 5.2-rc-1 and am
>> building/uploading Tapestry 5.2-rc-2 right now.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > We are very pleased to announce the first release candidate preview of
>> > Tapestry 5.3.
>> >
>> > Tapestry 5.3 is significantly faster than Tapestry 5.2, and is more
>> > memory efficient ... a long with tons of significant new features,
>> > improvements, and bug fixes.
>> >
>> > Details here:
>> http://tapestry.apache.org/2011/10/31/tapestry-53-release-candidate.html
>> >
>> > This is still a preview release, but we encourage the Tapestry
>> > community to upgrade to this release. With positive feedback (and no
>> > show-stopping negative feedback) we should progress to a final release
>> > of 5.3 in a few weeks.
>> >
>> > For most users, the upgrade path is simply changing the version
>> > number, and performing a clean compile.
>> >
>> > Note that with each new release, we get a slew of panicked messages
>> > that Tapestry is broken in bizarre ways. These ALMOST ALWAYS turn out
>> > to be prior-release JARs still on the classpath, either in the
>> > developer's working directory, or in a servlet container deployment
>> > directory. Please carefully clean up your environment as part of the
>> > upgrade!
>> >
>> > There are some cases where Tapestry 5.3 performs more rigorous checks
>> > than Tapestry 5.2; for example, 5.3 ensures that event handler methods
>> > that reference a component id ("onSuccessFromLogin") correspond to an
>> > actual component ("login"); in Tapestry 5.2, this was not checked for,
>> > and the event handler method would never fire ... it likely has a typo
>> > in its name, or is related to a component that was removed from the
>> > template.  This particular check can be disabled:
>> >
>> http://tapestry.apache.org/configuration.html#Configuration-tapestry.compatibility.unknowncomponentidcheck.
>> ..
>> >
>> > It would be wise to start up your application under 5.3, then use the
>> > new PageCatalog page (http://localhost:8080/pagecatalog) and click the
>> > "load all" link, to force all pages to be loaded. This will quickly
>> > identify any coding problems in your application.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Howard M. Lewis Ship
>> >
>> > Creator of Apache Tapestry
>> >
>> > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
>> > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>> >
>> > (971) 678-5210
>> > http://howardlewisship.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>>
>> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>>
>> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
>> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>>
>> (971) 678-5210
>> http://howardlewisship.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Regards,*
> *Muhammad Gelbana
> Java Developer*
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to