I don't see anything weird with your configuration. I do not have adviseTransactionally() method in my code, and I am using Glassfish, so no EclipseLink or javax.persistence in my pom.xml, and JPA stuff works perfectly.
On Oct 19, 2011, at 9:58 PM, jesse wrote: > So here's my configuration (though there's not much to it): > > In addition to the T5 and tapestry-jpa dependencies in my pom, I also have > these: > > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId> > <artifactId>javax.persistence</artifactId> > <version>2.0.3</version> > </dependency> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId> > <artifactId>eclipselink</artifactId> > <version>2.2.1</version> > </dependency> > > I haven't changed my persistence.xml from when it was working fine with > tynamo (other than as I mentioned, needing to change the name of my > datasrouce for some reason). Located on my classpath in > src/main/resources/META-INF: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"; version="1.0"> > <persistence-unit name="stellaPeristenceUnit" transaction-type="JTA"> > <provider>org.eclipse.persistence.jpa.PersistenceProvider</provider> > <jta-data-source>jdbc/mypool</jta-data-source> > <class>com.mydomain.app.entity.OneOfMyEntities</class> > <class>com.mydomain.app.entity.AnotherOneOfMyEntities</class> > <properties> > <property name="eclipselink.target-database" value="MySQL" /> > <property name="eclipselink.cache.shared.default" > value="${tapestry.production-mode}"/> > </properties> > </persistence-unit> > </persistence> > > Then: > > I changed all of my import statements to use @CommitAfter from tapestry-jpa > instead of tynamo (note that I have of course removed the dependency for > tynamo from my pom) > > And I add transaction advice in my AppModule like so: > > @Match({"*DAO", "*DAOImpl"}) > public static void adviseTransactionally(JpaTransactionAdvisor advisor, > MethodAdviceReceiver receiver) { > advisor.addTransactionCommitAdvice(receiver); > } > > What else is there to it? Am I missing something? I'm not providing code > from my entities here, but I know that they are not the problem because as > I've already stated this project works great with tynamo's implementation of > tapestry-jpa and the same persistence.xml. My entities are somewhat > complicated, use inheritance, and have lazy loaded one to many and many to > many relationships... but obviously this should all just work, no? > > If it is indeed problems with my configuration, it would be great to get > some help. If it is a bug in T5 I would love to hear that it will be looked > into because I would HATE to get left behind and stuck with 5.2.6! > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/Problems-using-JPA-with-5-3-tp6898469p6911216.html > Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
