On 13.10.2011 10:34, Toby O'Rourke wrote:
I guess it is just a consistency thing. Convention dictates that CSS files are served with the .css extension, why break that convention if we don't have to?
Isn't this discussion about dynamic generated CSS?
For static web pages it is a convention for them to be .html or .htm For static CSS it is good to be .cssWhy? Because sometimes web server admins, configure static resources to be served via a faster static server (e.g. nginx, lighthttpd)
But if this is programatically generated css, it is by nature dynamic and should not be served as a static resource, so I think it is better to not use any extension at all in order to be safe.
Or I misunderstood something
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
