Cool, it works!
I had tried it, but forgotten that method names are not shortened, so as
Robert suggested you have to use the full method name:
${getFoo('bar')}
works.
${foo('bar')}
does not.
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 01:53 +0200, Martin Strand wrote:
> Just remember that method names are not "shortened" in the same way
> property names are.
>
> i.e. invoking this method:
> public String getClass(String link)
>
> would look like:
> ${getClass('link1')}
>
> On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 01:33:39 +0200, Robert Zeigler
> <robert.zeig...@roxanemy.com> wrote:
>
> > Have you tried? :)
> > ${} is using the property expression language under the hood, which
> > /does/ support method evaluation/method arguments, so I would expect
> > ${class('link1')} to work... but i haven't tried it, either. :)
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > On Jun 25, 2011, at 6/256:31 PM , Joel Halbert wrote:
> >
> >> I'm pretty sure the answer's NO, but just incase I'll ask anyway.
> >>
> >> Is it possible to include method arguments in template expansions?
> >>
> >> I would die to be able to just do this:
> >>
> >> <a href="link1" class="${class('link1')}">link1</a>
> >> <a href="link2" class="${class('link2')}">link2</a>
> >> <a href="link3" class="${class('link3')}">link3</a>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
