The big three for Java are CMA (Container Managed Authentication)
which you are using, Spring Security (ex-Acegi Security, Tapestry
integration provided by tapestry-spring-security module) and Apache
Shiro (ex-JSecurity, Tapestry integration provided by Tynamo's
tapestry-security). I've spent more time with all of them that I care
to admit, and I've moved through them in that order in search of more
flexible security framework that allows me to do what I want without
getting in the way. Shiro is by no means perfect (which is why I
signed up as a committer) but from my experience, by far the most
flexible. For OpenId and Oauth there are several projects available
and you can piecemeal it together to your home-grown security
framework or CMA if you really wanted to, but I wouldn't recommend.

Kalle


On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> wrote:
> Thanks guys I'll definitely look at tynamo security.
> There is a lot of homegrown code in our implementation that feels like it 
> should be a part of a framework that's already been written. I guess that 
> tynamo security is that framework.
>
> Anything else I should be l should be looking at in this space?  Perhaps not 
> necessarily tapestry related?
>
>
> On Jun 1, 2011, at 2:11 PM, "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" 
> <thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:33:47 -0300, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> My current project is to refresh a client's web site using tapestry. The 
>>> web site currently uses JSP.  We have a JEE/web service backend that uses 
>>> JPA/EJB3.1 which we will continue to use.
>>> We now have a JEE based authorization service API based on plain method 
>>> calls now.
>>> What we want is to keep the current login scheme and add LDAP and possibly 
>>> Facebook ID and openid.
>>
>> For using Facebook ID and OpenID, check 
>> http://tynamo.org/tynamo-federatedaccounts+guide. Beyond that, I can't see 
>> why using the existing API in Tapestry would be different from your existing 
>> code, besides that Tapestry templates don't allow code (scriptlets). I'd 
>> suggest you to build some components to encapsulate common scenarios 
>> (something like a IfUserHasPermission component), maybe a couple mixins, and 
>> using the ComponentRequestFilter and/or RequestFilter pipelines for 
>> cross-page logic.
>>
>> --
>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>> Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and 
>> instructor
>> Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
>> http://www.arsmachina.com.br
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to