On Fri, 13 May 2011 12:52:36 -0300, Clément Uster <clement.us...@gmail.com> wrote:

Ok, I understand.
Interesting approach, thanks.

It's one of what I consider one of the hidden gems of Tapestry: its server-side DOM.

This may cause a lot of pain !

I'm not following you . . .

So, can I conclude that the use of @Property wouldn't be recommended within components ? Because (even with mixins) you may want to have access to some properties of the component...

I'd say that you shouldn't use @Property when you think it's interesting to provide access to other classes.

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and instructor
Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to