I'm sorry about confusion. That's right, a much better way of generalizing what is a component is to check the package. For Tapestry component, if it lives in org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.components, then it is a component.
Adam On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 06 May 2011 09:00:04 -0300, Adam Zimowski <zimowsk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> http://tapestry.apache.org/component-reference.html >> At the bottom, there is a list of base classes which make a component >> class a component. If a class does not derive from one of them, it >> technically IS NOT a component. > > This is not correct. Tapestry components are true POJOs: they don't need to > implement any interface or subclass any class. All classes inside the > components package and its subpackages are components. > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, and > instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
