As far as I know, Tapestry. This is to leverage the fact that for assets, Tapestry will cache the GZIPed assets, meaning that in the long run, much lower server load.
Is anyone aware (translation: I'm too lazy to check) if Apache can cache the GZIPed stream as well? On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:25 AM, stephanos2k <stephan.beh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Out of sheer interest: Assuming Apache is used in front of Tapestry, which of > the two would be the best place to GZIP resources? Why? > > PS: Considering speed, CPU/memory usage & compatibility - not considering: > setup & maintenance > > Cheers, > Stephanos > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/GZIP-Tapestry-or-Apache-tp4264432p4264432.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
