Hi, This isn't a Tapestry issue. I don't know anything about the tap-hibernate extension, but Tapestry itself isn't stopping you from accessing multiple databases.
mrg On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:31 AM, antalk <ant...@intercommit.nl> wrote: > > True, > > But they have forgotten to ask if the original poster wants to use multiple > databases, if so i wouldn't encourage using Tapestry (sigh). > > For me this is one of the biggest letdown's , i have written 2 apps in Tap > 5.2 who both require access to multiple datasources, but the inability to > use multiple databases (through tap-hibernate) has required me to do some > hacking around to get this working. > > If i knew this beforehand i dont think i had choosen Tapestry.. > > On the other hand i think the framework is great and provides me with enough > flexibilty to do what i want to do. > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Noticed-another-stackoverflow-question-on-Tapestry-5-go-vote-tp3377101p3377198.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
