Ulrich,
of course you are entitled to your opinion.
p.
On 25/11/2010 6:47 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
That's just plain wrong. The form of communication (forum vs. mailing
list) will have no impact at all on whether questions you ask are
answered more or less conclusively. It's how you ask your question and
what information you provide that influences the likelihood whether
you'll get a satisfying answer or not.
On 25.11.2010 00:33, Paul Stanton wrote:
"They (forums) are to publish discussions on specific matters."
Exactly! I'm often disappointed with the level of help offered here,
and maybe that's because the
mailing list is too much a "community where people try to stay
connected continuously" and not
enough a question/answer type discussion.
I think there's a great need for a simple, searchable question/answer
'area' whether it's a forum or
something different, where new users can ask those 'dumb' questions
(tapestry veterans may think
their dumb) where there's a good likelihood that they will be
answered in full instead of just
falling down the list.
Especially with the design of tapestry is such that the internals are
not exposed to the developer
(ie no polymophism) which makes it more difficult for developers to
get a grasp on what is available
to them.
I've asked a number of questions here which I feel have never had a
conclusive answer, i'm sure i'm
not the only one.
Not to say people aren't helpful, that's that what i think the
problem is. I think it's the
mechanism (mailing list) more than anything else.
p.
On 25/11/2010 3:33 AM, Ivano Luberti wrote:
Stack Overflow must be a forum because it is a way to collect many
professionals of various competences. But forums are not for community
where people try to stay connected continuously.
They are to publish discussions on specific matters.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:46, Paul Stanton<p...@mapshed.com.au>
wrote:
i know most of you guys, who have been using ml for so long
probably prefer
ml, that's not the point!
i guarantee there's a number of users who don't want to configure
their
inbox for ml and give up.
just a thought, if no one can see the benefit i guess it isn't
going to
happen!
i use stackoverflow a lot and attempt to answer or contribute to most
tapestry questions.
p.
On 24/11/2010 8:35 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote:
I prefer ml to forums and in nay case ML web archives allow to
search
them.
I cannot see any other advantage of a forum over a ml.
Il 24/11/2010 4.56, Paul Stanton ha scritto:
how about adding a forum?
personally i prefer forums to mailing lists, and i believe a lot of
people don't participate in this 'user-group' community and
therefore
don't get help and therefore don't like tapestry...
if you want to attract more users i recommend this.
p.
On 20/11/2010 8:15 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
We're still working out the kinks ... and I've been working
hard on
revising
the tutorial ... but at long last, we're debuting the new Tapestry
Web Site:
http://tapestry.apache.org/
Feedback is encouraged; just post to users@tapestry.apache.org
with
[SITE]
in the subject.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
