just uploaded a readme with instructions so you can test it :-)

Am 21.11.2010 um 11:48 schrieb Inge Solvoll:

> This is the most exciting news I've heard in a long time. Introducing T5 IOC
> as a standard IOC choice for bigger frameworks could be a very important
> move for Tapestry. We should find out if more can be done in this field, for
> Spring MVC, JSF and other frameworks that are bigger than T5.
> 
> The bad news is: From what I've seen and heard, people that really care
> about writing nice and clean framework-indepenent IOC-code in their web
> project are a minority. People simply don't care about separating their
> business logic from the framework. I asked the creators of the Play
> framework about IOC-integration at a conference recently, and only got a
> vague answer about Spring integration. The IOC-integration for Wicket
> (Spring, Guice) also seems immature. A bit of guessing here, but this is my
> impression.
> 
> I'm looking for a new job here in Norway, and the only web framework
> mentioned apart from Spring MVC is Wicket. So creating a usable and stable
> integration of T5 IOC would be absolutely brilliant. For me personally, it
> would make it way easier to bring Tapestry along to my new job as a pure IOC
> engine. That's a very good start!
> 
> I'm not a Wicket man, don't know it too much. But I will probably need to
> learn it sooner or later for clients, so I would like to participate in
> stabilizing this thing by creating a Wicket project and trying it out!
> 
> Inge
> 
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Christian Riedel
> <cr.ml...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> 
>> But Howard said, we have to evangelize people - why not by infiltration ;-)
>> 
>> 
>> Am 20.11.2010 um 22:32 schrieb Igor Drobiazko:
>> 
>>> We should ban you from the mailing list for it.
>>> 
>>> No, no just joking. To be honest I don't believe this will help to
>> improve
>>> the adoption. I experienced the Wicket users as very religious about
>> their
>>> framework and very aggressive towards Tapestry. A lot of them would
>> rather
>>> die than using Tapestry.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Christian Riedel
>>> <cr.ml...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> 
>>>> I started a little project today: I made a module for Wicket so that it
>>>> uses Tapestry IOC for injection (I'm not joking, seriously :-))!
>>>> Yesterday I had the idea to do that after I was annoyed again while
>> using
>>>> Wicket for one of my projects... I was looking for a way to have fun
>> with
>>>> Wicket and since I was struggling with its Spring integration I came up
>> with
>>>> that project. It was so absurd to have them both work together, I
>> thought ,
>>>> instead of competing each other. So I had to give it a try - no way out
>> :-)
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe someone would really use it if it's mature enough and migrate a
>>>> Wicket application over to Tapestry! That'll be awesome! :-)
>>>> 
>>>> The code is quite simple, it's using reflection to do the injection (I
>> was
>>>> inspired by the guice integration). I'm looking for a way to do it
>> similar
>>>> to the ClassTransformationWorker. I only implemented @Inject and
>>>> @InjectService - no hibernate until now. My motivation is to find a
>> useful
>>>> frame of features that could be provided (apart from finding a proper
>> place
>>>> for the shutdown hook...). I really want to get rid of Spring and
>> migrate
>>>> that one application mentioned above to Tapestry one day. That's one
>> goal at
>>>> least.
>>>> 
>>>> What do you think about it? Could it help Tapestry to find adoption in
>> the
>>>> Wicket-world?
>>>> 
>>>> Or am I getting excommunicated by the community for that blasphemous
>>>> chimera? (I could call it *Wickestry* but I don't dare to)
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Christian
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [link] https://github.com/criedel/WicketTap5IOC
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Igor Drobiazko
>>> http://tapestry5.de
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to