Yes, Thiago, I was just about to post this other solution, which I finally used, because although the previous one resolves the recursion problem, it generates conflicts about the two services coexisting when it is needed. So the decoration, like you said, does the same thing (in this case) and doesn't have any of the problems.
Thanks for your help. Regards, Raul. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry-users.832.n2.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-override-a-service-if-I-need-Request-service-in-order-to-do-it-tp5437958p5438087.html Sent from the Tapestry Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
