Jonathon, Howard, Thanks for the responses. I'm leaning towards Howard's explanation. The processes are accessing newly created / persisted objects so I don't think sharing attached objects across more than one session should arise. I do however have some buried code where I force a transaction to commit to allow me to assign some non-customer facing entity keys in batches, to reduce db hits - this is probably causing the problem - I'll synchronize that as it's not called too often and hopefully that will do it. Thanks for the tips guys.
Regards, Jim. -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Barker [mailto:jonathan.theit...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 July 2010 02:31 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: non thread safe access to session Jim, I have vague recollections of hitting this before. IIRC, each hibernate object knows the Session that it is associated with. So, if an object is associated with Session A on Thread A, and you modify that object from Thread B, then Session A now has to manage changes made from a different thread, which presents lots of challenges. So, I think it's not so much about your handling of the Sessions, as it is about handling session-managed objects that get accessed from different threads. Can you detach your objects before allowing other threads to access them? Regards, Jonathan On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Jim O'Callaghan <jc1000...@yahoo.co.uk>wrote: > Yep Thiago, it's Tapestry-Hibernate creating the sessions. My situation > might be a little contrived, but I'm concerned it might happen to > end-users, as I don't fully understand why it's happening. > > Regards, > Jim. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo [mailto:thiag...@gmail.com] > Sent: 21 July 2010 18:22 > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Re: non thread safe access to session > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:58:15 -0300, Jim O'Callaghan > <jc1000...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Hi Thiago, > > Hi, Jim! > > > I'm talking about the hibernate session - I'm injecting it into the > > constructor of Service B at bind time. I thought Tapestry would treat > > the service as a thread safe singleton and control access to method > > calls on it accordingly? > > Tapestry-IoC doesn't synchronize method calls. How are you building the > sessions? Tapestry-Hibernate? > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, > and instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informa??o Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Jonathan Barker ITStrategic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org