Inge Solvoll-2 wrote: > > Sounds like you did a ServiceOverride without actually realizing it > yourself > :) > well i was pretty sure i'm reinventing some wheels :) . of course i wanted > to do a service override as soon as i realized that PropertyAccess is > introduced via ioc
Inge Solvoll-2 wrote: > > And you have an excellent solution to your problem. Here is a link that > explains how to not do it using a very very ugly hack :) > thanks, try it as soon as possible. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/T5.1-Setters-returning-value-tp28288048p28328938.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
