Nope - we don't use a CDN for the main website - but we do for the video associated with it.
The reason is our hardware/bandwidth are more that capable of delivering the web content more cost effectively that using a CDN. For video the bandwidth is sufficiently large it is cheaper to use a CDN so we do. Ben Gidley www.gidley.co.uk b...@gidley.co.uk On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:10 AM, ARD Marx Tobias <tobias.marx...@daserste.de>wrote: > Hi Ben! > > Are you going to use a CDN to deliver the website in the future? > > Thanks! > > Tobias > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Ben Gidley [mailto:b...@gidley.co.uk] > Gesendet: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:20 AM > An: Tapestry users > Betreff: Tapestry Scaling > > Hi, > > I thought it was worth posting an update on the launch of > http://www.seesaw.com/ - we launched the site to the public this month. > > The site has seen a lot of visitors over its launch period (I am not > allowed > to release actual stats) but Alexa shows us just as the 1200 most popular > site in the UK. Our load testing has shown the site scaling to 33 > pages/second (the transactions/second is a lot higher if you include > images/javascript/css). > > The key things this has demonstrated are > - T5 hasn't got in production any inevitable memory leaks > - Performance doesn't degrade over time > > We are also very pleased with how our migration to Tapestry has worked out > - > we have a lot of nice (reusable) components that gives our editorial team a > good degree of control over the site. > > We are hoping the user base will now start to grow - as we are starting TV > adv > > Ben Gidley > > www.gidley.co.uk > b...@gidley.co.uk > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
