On 12.02.2010 11:49, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
> That's the ideal approach. But I think realoadable services still have
> their value: when some requirement is changed, the change in code
> could be applied to an application in production without restarting
> the context or the application. This could be a big plus for high
> traffic sites. As Howard says, Tapestry provides dynamic language
> productivity using a static typed language. :)
>
This is absolutely to the point one of the aspects I was refering to.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to