Em Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:16:15 -0200, Alessandro Bottoni
<alexbott...@gmail.com> escreveu:
Il 29/12/2009 21:32, Alex Kotchnev ha scritto:
approach. As Thiago already mentioned, there are at least a few more
solutions that attempt to provide this (e.g. Thiago's own,
chenillekit-access, and a bunch more).
Let's me play the Devil's advocate for a moment...
I guess Alex suggested to start the development of a Tapestry security
package based on some package that already exists, not adopting them as
part of the Tapestry project as they are now. We all agree that
documentation is key and should be improved.
Moreover, in many cases it would be very hard to convince the project
leader or the end user to accept a (sorry Thiago ....) not-canonical,
little known, little documented, maybe-risky library like this one.
I never suggested that someone should use a little documented package, so
I don't know why you're apologizing to me. :)
Little-known library? Unfortunately, Tapestry is not a very well-known
library AFAIK. :(
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer,
and instructor
Owner, software architect and developer, Ars Machina Tecnologia da
Informação Ltda.
http://www.arsmachina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
