I've put some comments into the issue itself.

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Massimo Lusetti <mluse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, ThreadLocal.get()/remove() was buggy and not thread
>> safe in JDK 1.5.
>
> Do you actually mean 'is' not 'was' ?
>
> Couldn't this be (re)written without using syncronized blocks?
> --
> Massimo
> http://meridio.blogspot.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to