Hi Inge

The solution you provide works fine.
But to a lesser mortal like me, the description of ITERATION in
LoopFormState is a bit difficult
/**
  * Only enough state to iterate over the source values is stored. When the
Form is submitted, 
the Loop will  re-acquire its source and iterate over it. This is equivalent
to "volatile" mode in Tapestry 5.0. This can be subject to race conditions
when the values within the source change between render and submit.*/

>From above its ok to guess what it is doing, but how is it solving the
co-ercion problem

Any discussions?

Thanks
Sandeep


Inge Solvoll-2 wrote:
> 
> I struggled a lot with loops in forms, I still do to tell you the truth.
> See
> this page in jumpstart, it helped me a lot. If you use
> formstate="ITERATION", it won't ask you for a coercer. Formstate and loops
> is one of the harder concepts of T5 in my opinion, it doesn't seem logical
> to me so I don't understand what to do.
> 
> http://202.177.217.122:8080/jumpstart/examples/tables/editableloop1
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 7:47 AM, sandeepraj singh <
> sandeepraj.si...@atosorigin.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi Niclas,
>> Sorry for a delayed response.
>> The solution you suggest is not working.
>> My Original Code is like below
>>
>> <t:loop source="mYlist" value="prop:MyDataObject" > ...
>> myDataObject.myOtherContent
>> </t:loop>
>>
>> As per your suggestion i changed it to
>> <t:loop source="mYlist" value="prop:MyDataObject"
>> volatile=MyDataObject.myContent> ...
>> myDataObject.myOtherContent
>> </t:loop>
>>
>> also tried with values of Volatile = "true" etc
>> It still asks for co-ercion of String to MyDataObject
>>
>> Would be grateful for any further pointers
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sandeep
>>
>>
>> Niclas.Meier wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi sandeep,
>> >
>> > The effekt that occurs is, that tapestry tries to provide a loop
>> > context/state for the enclosing form. You need this if you have any
>> fields
>> > in your loop.
>> >
>> > If you don¹t want/need to provide a context you may mark the loop as
>> > voliatile. This looks like:
>> >
>> > <t:loop source="mYlist" value="prop:MyDataObject" volatile=²true²> ...
>> > </t:loop>
>> >
>> > Otherwise you'll have to provide a form state. I guess it would look
>> like
>> >
>> > <t:loop source="mYlist" value="prop:MyDataObject"
>> > volatile=²MyDataObject.someID²> ... </t:loop>
>> >
>> > The tapestry error message in this case is - IMHO - improvable ;-)
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Niclas
>> >
>> >
>> > On 30.10.09 08:31, "sandeepraj singh" <sandeepraj.si...@atosorigin.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi All,
>> >> I have the following
>> >>
>> >> In MyComponent.tml
>> >> <t:loop source="mYlist" value="prop:MyDataObject">
>> >>
>> >>          ${MyDataObject.someothervariable} </li>
>> >>
>> >> </t:loop>
>> >>
>> >> Ofcourse there is supporting code for the same in MyComponent.java.
>> ie.
>> >> having an istance variable of MyDataObject etc.
>> >>
>> >> In my Page, there are 2 cases
>> >> 1) I use the component without an enclosing form. In this case the
>> >> component
>> >> works abs fine.
>> >> 2) I use the component with an enclosing form. In such a case ,i
>> recieve
>> >> co-ercion error because of the context value that is being passed and
>> is
>> >> mapped to MyDataObject. The error is recieved only when the Enclosing
>> >> FORM
>> >> IS SUBMITTED.
>> >>
>> >> For scenario 2, i make a contribution to TypeCoercer to force creation
>> of
>> >> MyDataObject so that the problem is solved. But can any one think of a
>> >> better way. A way in which some code in My Component takes care of the
>> >> problem rather than a contribution inthe service.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> sandeep
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://old.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-contribution-to-TypeCoercer-in-my-case.-tp2
>> >> 6126002p26126002.html
>> >> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-contribution-to-TypeCoercer-in-my-case.-tp26126002p26279024.html
>> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/How-to-avoid-contribution-to-TypeCoercer-in-my-case.-tp26126002p26282712.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to