Why not also use your condition 't:if' in the body of the AjaxFormLoop...

2009/10/1 cordenier christophe <christophe.corden...@gmail.com>

> Actually, i had a closer look to AjaxFormLoop. Here the Javascript that
> launches trigger the start for add row event :
>
>     ajaxFormLoop : function(spec)
>     {
>         var rowInjector = $(spec.rowInjector);
>
>         $(spec.addRowTriggers).each(function(triggerId)
>         {
>             $(triggerId).observe("click", function(event)
>             {
>                 $(rowInjector).trigger();
>
>                 Event.stop(event);
>             })
>         });
>     }
>
> Maybe you can override this method to add an Ajax call (event link) before
> ' $(rowInjector).trigger();' to call a method that verify if the trigger
> method must be called.
>
> I'm not sure this is the easiest way :)
>
>
>
> 2009/10/1 Stefan <ste...@wammel.com>
>
>> Here's what i've tried, but it won't work as expected.It works only after
>> a page reload or a reload of the whole formloop.
>>
>> Define your own AddRowLink that checks a condition before
>> launching the AddRow Event...
>>
>> How can i check conditions *before* triggering the event?
>>
>> <t:parameter name="addRow" >
>>  <td colspan="5" style="text-align: right">
>>  <t:if test="addRowEnabled" t:zone="formLoopZone">
>>  <t:addrowlink>${message:addRow}</t:addrowlink>
>>  <p:else>
>>  ${message:maximumRowsReached}
>> </p:else>
>>  </t:if>
>>  </td>
>> </t:parameter>
>>
>>
>> Am 01.10.2009 um 09:53 schrieb cordenier christophe:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Maybe you can achieve this by setting the addRow parameter on the
>> AjaxFormLoop. Define your own AddRowLink that checks a condition before
>> launching the AddRow Event...
>>
>> 2009/10/1 Stefan <ste...@wammel.com>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> is it possible to block adding further rows to an AjaxFormloop?
>>
>> Inside my addRow method i check some things and in some cases I don't want
>>
>> to add further rows.
>>
>> In these cases i return a FALSE (tried NULL also), but the last row will
>> be
>>
>> appended twice (or more times).
>>
>>
>> What's going wrong here?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to