It is also unusual/unconvenient that menu items reflected on up/down keys.
If I expand menu item and it contents doesn't fit the screen I want to
scroll the page by the down key, and in current implementation I don't get
what I expect.

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 00:01, Dmitry Gusev <dmitry.gu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you interested in my opinion, I don't like left nav menu how its
> implemented, because only one item could be viewed at a time.
> For me it would be better if I can have several groups expanded at one
> time.
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 23:49, Sebastian Hennebrueder 
> <use...@laliluna.de>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I finished the last open tasks for the new website.  I would appreciate,
>> if we get this finished as soon as possible as I need to focus on my normal
>> work for the next weeks. In addition, we have to continuously update the
>> current status in case changes happen to existing docs, so it would be nice
>> to get this in the trunk as soon as possible.
>>
>> So please core committers, if possible take some time to get this finally
>> decided. Most of the work is done anyway, it is more a question of getting
>> the content into the subversion repository and staging the content.
>>
>> The website can be tested here http://tapestry.laliluna.de and you can
>> get the current status from my git repository:  git clone
>> http://dev.laliluna.de/public/tapestry-website.git/ tapestry-website
>>
>> I fixed the broken links reported by Ivano and repaired the JQuery
>> documentation in order that the correct menus are always open.
>>
>> I integrated the userguide in the website in order to show how it would
>> look like.
>> I discussed with Howard that there are mainly two options to place the
>> userguide. Howard points out that the current approach to have the user
>> guide integrated in the tapestry project, makes it easier to keep it aligned
>> with the source code version and doesn't require a second commit to be done.
>> It might be more likely that the doc gets updated in that case.
>>
>> My proposal is to integrate the userguide into the normal webpage because
>> of two reason. We can continously work on the userguide and publish updates
>> from time to time without waiting for the next release to come out. My
>> strategy for the branches look like this.
>> The website is published from a 'toPublish' branch. This branch has
>> currently the 5.1.0.5 documentation.  We allow this branch to be updated as
>> long as the 5.1.0.6 release appears. Then a 5.1.0.5 tag is made. The most
>> current work happens as usual in the trunk, but as I said before, be might
>> update the current published branch from the changes in the trunk. We have a
>> slightly higher effort when adding content to the current published version
>> but at least can do it and we have still a kind of alignment to the code.
>>
>> Both options are possible and it would be nice if this is decided as soon
>> as possible. We can change this back at any time. It is more or less a
>> copying of about 10 files from A to b and a minimal change in two site.xml
>>
>> Please state your opinion, if the website proposal is fine or not.
>>
>> Andreas pointed out that we might move the new website to GitHub. You need
>> to decide as well, if we do this or keep everything in the normal subversion
>> repository. My private repo is only a temporarily solution.
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards / Viele Grüße
>>
>> Sebastian Hennebrueder
>> -----
>> Software Developer and Trainer for Hibernate / Java Persistence
>> http://www.laliluna.de
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dmitry Gusev
>
> AnjLab Team
> http://anjlab.com
>



-- 
Dmitry Gusev

AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com

Reply via email to