On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Piero Sartini <li...@pierosartini.de>wrote:

> > Is @Property so hard or awful?
>
> No, it isn't. But for me these kind of objects have temporary character. I
> really don't like them to pollute my page classes.


And to me, that's exactly what page classes are for.


>
>
> Maybe its just me, but if I need a property just to iterate over a list it
> feels like it could be optimized.... tapestry is reducing needed code
> whereever possible. In this particular case I think its hard to understand
> why
> it breaks with this rule. Especially because var: is available and iterates
> over the object fine: callit .toString() method if displayed.
>
> But accessing the properties of an object that is there fails... its just
> something I would not have expected.
>
>        Piero
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos

Reply via email to