On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:32 AM, ice<fra...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems a bit awkward to have a project called tapestry-core that depends > in two third-party javascript libraries.
The problem is: how would Tapestry do that? Not using any framework? This would mean the committers would need to spend an awful lot of time rewriting something that Javascript frameworks already do. Not only this, but also to cope with the insonsistencies between browsers. Defining an API that could be implemented in Prototype, jQuery or another framework? More viable, but still a lot of work. > It's not just java developers who are affected by using Prototype,but also > designers, as it is the case in my project. Tapestry is not forcing you to use any Javascript framework, just to use jQuery.noConflict() and jQuery() instead of $() when you want ot use jQuery. -- Thiago --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
