2009/5/31 Robert Zeigler <robe...@scazdl.org>: > So, you're suggesting that a translator named, eg, "StringTranslator" would > be the default for strings, "IntegerTranslator" for integers, and so forth. > It could be done.
Yes, but Translator name property should be meaningful, not class name of Translator. So, "string" would be default for java.lang.String, "integer" for Integer and so forth. Lukasz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
