On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Geoffrey Wiseman < geoffrey.wise...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Possibly, if I write my own encoder, this goes away entirely, as I can > subclass the default and provide an implementation for > provideMissingObject(). I'm not sure, but that might accomplish what I'm > looking for. > > > Near as I can tell, that's not an option -- after looking a little closer, looks like provideMissingObject() is to handle the case where there's a server-side object without anything in the form, rather than the situation where there's data in the form with no corresponding server-side object. In fact, since loop does its work iterating over the server-side class, it looks like any form data without a corresponding object in the source collection will basically be silently dropped. Am I misinterpreting something? I've only been digging into the Loop class for a short time, so it's still possible that I've missed something important. - Geoffrey -- Geoffrey Wiseman http://www.geoffreywiseman.ca/
