> That's really strange. Tapestry CRUD has some classes that are meant
> to be subclassed, have a generic field and it works.
You are probably right, then it can't possible be the case... let me check it
some more and I will let you know.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <thiag...@gmail.com>
To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 7 April, 2009 15:22:18 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest,
Istanbul
Subject: Re: Inherited properties
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Peter Stavrinides
<p.stavrini...@albourne.com> wrote:
> Oh and @Persist proper doesn't make a difference either.
That's really strange. Tapestry CRUD has some classes that are meant
to be subclassed, have a generic field and it works. Something like:
abstract class BaseEditPage<T,. ID> {
private T object;
public T getObject() { return object; }
public void setObject(T object) { this.object = object; }
}
Maybe you're hit a Tapestry bug. Could you post more code here?
--
Thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
