Part of the driving force here is to have servlet Tapestry and portlet Tapestry (when it arrives) work the same.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Dave Greggory <davegregg...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > While I highly agree the redirect-after-post pattern is a good practice. It > only makes sense in some situations. It makes sense to use it when you're > submitting a form and the form submission was successful (ie. Tapestry > "success" event fires). But if validation fails, Tapestry should not be using > a redirect to re-show the form with the validation errors. > > When validation fails, it should use the response for the same request for > re-showing the form, it should not be sending a 302. I wish there is a way to > disable redirects for validation failures only. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Robert Zeigler <robe...@scazdl.org> > To: Tapestry users <users@tapestry.apache.org> > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 12:34:56 PM > Subject: Re: Implication of client side redirect > > Hi Rajesh, > > Tapestry follows the "redirect after post" principle. This has a lot of > "pros" (avoiding double submission of forms, for instance), but if you're > really concerned about it, there's a configuration option to turn it off. > > In org.apache.tapestry5.SymbolConstants: > > /** > * If set to true, then action requests will render a page markup response > immediately, rather than sending a > * redirect to render the response. > */ > public static final String SUPPRESS_REDIRECT_FROM_ACTION_REQUESTS = > "tapestry.suppress-redirect-from-action-requests"; > > > Cheers, > > Robert > > 11, 2009, at 3/1110:35 AM , rajesh sukumaran wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I am evaluating Tapestry 5.1 to see if I can use it in one of my new >> projects. I see that Tapestry uses client side redirects to handle response >> for event requests. Will this not affect the performance of Tapestry >> applications, especially under high load? Redirects will result in an >> additional HTTP hit on the server for every event request that is rendered >> by a different page. Will this not degrade the responsiveness of the web >> application as the load increase? >> >> I would like to know what everyone thinks about this? >> >> regards, >> Rajesh >> >> >> >> >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to >> http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
