Which is why I'm anxious to release Tapestry 5.1 and demonstrate the seriousness concerning backwards compatibility.
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:46:41 -0300, Luther Baker <lutherba...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > >> "Further, the design of Tapestry 5 was created specifically to make it >> possible to continue adding features without breaking backwards >> compatibility going forward. There will not need to be a Tapestry 6." > > There was a very annoying troll in this list, some time ago, that always > talked about the lack of backward compatibility of major Tapestry releases . > . . > > Talking about trolling, but now on the funny side, not the annoying one, > read this: > http://www.jroller.com/javelotinfo/entry/trolling_with_java_web_frameworks > :D Funny and informative at the same time . . . > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor > http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
