Em Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:18:46 -0300, Ivano Luberti <lube...@archicoop.it>
escreveu:
pheeew !
Thanks for the quick answer to all of you.
You're welcome!
I was afraid I had made one of the biggest mistake in my life.
Maybe you just made one of the best decisions in your life.. :)
But can you tell me why the choice to abandon the old syntax has been
taken: to me from the web designer point of view it is still the most
clean way to implement the call to tapestry.
Tapestry 5 haven't really abondened the old syntax, besides $content$ and
$remove$, but they're easily replaced with simple components.
I guess Howard (Tapestry creator and main developer) just wanted to create
another syntax, one that is friendlier with XML editors (namespaces). I
never use the <t:componentName> syntax in pages and almost never in
components and I'm quite happy with it. :)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
