Em Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:56:09 -0300, Robert Zeigler <robe...@scazdl.org>
escreveu:
3) Otherwise, access in the child via code is mediated through normal
java channels: create a public (or protected) getter and setter in the
Parent class.
I guess he's trying to subclass Tapestry core components. This was already
discussed in this list and the summary is "the components will stay as
they are to avoid backward compatibilities in the future".
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
