No problem at all Carl, I didn't understand it in that way. I just wanted to say, that with the speed of development in the concerned OSS frameworks it could very well be that a new consideration could yield a new outcome.
2009/2/3 Carl Crowder <carl.crow...@taptu.com> > Sorry Otho, I wasn't attempting to prevent discussion, I just wanted to > point it out in order to add to the discussion. > > > Otho wrote: > >> Grails specifically. Groovy as such is possible right now. In the simple >> cases I tested there were no glitches. But some frameworks can serve right >> now as frontend to grails. As I said, I have no idea of the technical >> implications which an integration of Tapestry would require, but I am >> sure, >> that - if possible - it would benefit both but especially Tapestry by a >> large margin. Grails' mailinglist is in this account only 2 months longer >> but has more than double the posts. If you subtract the Tap4 related posts >> in this time from the mailinglist it is more like 3 or even 4:1. So there >> is >> an active and large userbase and at least for me Tapestry would definitely >> be the ui/service plugin of choice when starting a Grails production >> project. >> >> Carl, in the portion of the mailinglist I have here in my account (since >> may >> 07) there was no such discussion and that means that it was maybe >> concerning >> versions of grails up to version 0.3 or so. Grails developed since then >> and >> so did Tapestry. I don't think it would harm to reconsider it taking the >> latest developments into account. E.g. the embracement of Grails by >> SpringSource. >> > > Regards, >> Otho >> >> 2009/2/3 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <thiag...@gmail.com> >> >> Grails specifically or Groovy? >>> >>> Em Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:27:26 -0300, Otho <taa...@googlemail.com> >>> escreveu: >>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>>> I don't know if it is even conceptionally or technically possible, so my >>>> suggestion may seem a bit strange. But would it be possible to integrate >>>> grails and Tapestry in the way it was done with wicket? Aka Tapestry as >>>> a >>>> GUI plugin? >>>> >>>> I think that would be a huge popularity boost. The simplicity and >>>> elegance >>>> Tapestry has to offer in many areas combined with some of the neat ideas >>>> in >>>> grails would create a really powerful stack. >>>> >>>> What do you think about that? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Otho >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >>> Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor >>> Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java >>> http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
