On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm of the opinion that it's easier to remove unwanted stuff than add > it in.
Tapestry-hibernate, when it is in the classpath, tries to create a SessionFactory. So, if someone wants the Tapestry archetype without Hibernate, at first he/she will have an exception. This has happened in this list at least two times, as far as I can remember. This way, I don't think the Tapestry archetype must not have Tapestry-Hibernate. I also agree with Francois arguments. -- Thiago --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
