It's all in the subversion repository.

http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/source-repository.html


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Stavrinides [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 December 2008 16:09
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: IoC registry survives between JUnit tests?
>
> Hi Howard
>
> I use easymock and JUnit to test IoC services, would love to see some
> of your test code to steal some of your ideas :o) is any of it
> available ?
>
> Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian Edward Gruber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 8:53:22 AM GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
> Bucharest, Istanbul
> Subject: Re: IoC registry survives between JUnit tests?
>
> Ah.  Got it.
>
> Christian.
>
> On 4-Dec-08, at 21:41 , Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> > My point was that it was possible the IoC was being re-initialized on
> > each test and it wasn't noticeable because its very fast.
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Christian Edward Gruber
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Oh, not a critique of startup or shutdown performance on T5-ioc,
> >> but more of
> >> a general principle of unit testing components that participate in
> >> any IoC
> >> container.  To test the component, you shouldn't need to use the
> >> container,
> >> because it's a "unit" test.  But he said he was testing the wiring
> >> between
> >> components anyway, rather than the functionality of the units, so
> >> my comment
> >> isn't as relevant.
> >>
> >> Christian.
> >>
> >> On 4-Dec-08, at 15:23 , Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> >>
> >>> I use a mix of techniques, using a lot of mocks for true unit
> tests,
> >>> but also a lot of integration tests.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure what CEG has actually seen here; Registry.shutdown()
> is
> >>> very dramatic, it tears apart the registry (releasing almost
> >>> everything to the GC) and informs all of the proxies to shutdown as
> >>> well.  Could he just be missing the re-creation of the services in
> >>> later tests ... Registry startup is very, very fast once all the
> >>> underlying classes are instantiated.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Christian Edward Gruber
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> FYI, in general, you shouldn't be using the container in your
> >>>> tests,
> >>>> unless
> >>>> you're testing the wiring itself.  You should be creating the
> >>>> component/service under test, and constructing it with fakes.
> >>>> This isn't
> >>>> absolute but there is a lot more effort/configuration/overhead if
> >>>> you
> >>>> want
> >>>> to use the container infrastructure in your unit test, and you
> >>>> start to
> >>>> have
> >>>> subtle interactions that might potentially make it more of an
> >>>> integration
> >>>> test.  You risk testing more than one thing at a time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Christian
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4-Dec-08, at 01:28 , Stephan Schwab wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have several JUnit tests that instantiate
> >>>>> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.Registry via the RegistryBuilder before
> >>>>> tests
> >>>>> run.
> >>>>> Now I'm observing that services registered in one test are still
> >>>>> available
> >>>>> in other tests although I did call registry.shutdown(). My test
> >>>>> runner
> >>>>> does
> >>>>> not fork a new JVM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Calling registry.shutdown() should cause everything to vanish.
> >>>>> Is there
> >>>>> anything that causes one-registry-per-JVM?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Stephan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> http://www.caimito.net - Caimito One Team - Agile Collaboration
> >>>>> and
> >>>>> Planning
> >>>>> tool
> >>>>> http://www.stephan-schwab.com - Personal blog
> >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/tapestry-sesame - Authentication
> >>>>> extension for
> >>>>> Tapestry 5
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> View this message in context:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.nabble.com/IoC-registry-survives-between-JUnit-tests--
> tp20828078p20828078.html
> >>>>> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >>>
> >>> Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >
> > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Reply via email to