Good rant.  I completely agree.

On 15/10/2008, at 12:31 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:

Em Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:51:10 -0300, John Jimmy Dondapati <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > escreveu:

I am sorry if this has already been asked but is there anyway to integrate Spring Web Flow 2.x with Tapestry 5.x?

Nabble has a very good archive of this mailing list: 
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry---User-f340.html

Reasons :
1. I like the way SWF organizes the flow outside the code.
2. please add your own reasons.

<rant>
I don't really get why would I like keep the flow outside the code. Flow is application logic, and the best place to write logic, in my humble opinion, is code. Disclaimer: I am a former, very disgruntled Struts user. One of the reasons I have to not use JSF is that faces- config.xml is struts-config.xml (that is a pain) with some tags renamed. I hope XML programming dies quickly.
</rant>

When learning Tapestry, I strongly suggest you to not try to find how you can map some other framework concept or feature into Tapestry: try to learn its concepts. Think that every page is an ordinary object and that pages can interact with other just like objects interact with other objects.

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
Consultor, desenvolvedor e instrutor em Java
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to