> What 'it'? You mean symbol names? Well the 'it' was the class, or moreover the approach but that does result in specifically the symbol names in this instance, so: Yes that it, or they.
> Because That's the Way I Like It! :-) > Seriously, I struggled with myself about this and decided that in my case > it's better to have the >application start up and fail later IF a missing symbol is requested. Fair enough then. I did it differently (since I'd like to know at start up if my app is miss-configured), I guess the solution needs to fit the requirements. Cheers Russell -----Original Message----- From: Ulrich Stärk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 September 2008 16:15 To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: [T5] loading tapestry configuration from properties file? Russell Brown schrieb: > I still think you need to T5-alize it and make it case insensitive. What 'it'? You mean symbol names? > > And why oh why oh why bury your exceptions and just log them? Why not let > them bubble up so that > they are thrown? Otherwise you will just get a symbol exception which is hard > to figure out later > on? Because That's the Way I Like It! :-) Seriously, I struggled with myself about this and decided that in my case it's better to have the application start up and fail later IF a missing symbol is requested. Uli --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
