in version 5.0.9 it is working

I've addedvist class but still same situation _visit cannot be resolved

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Geoff Callender <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Fernando's right.  Your field curruser starts out as an ASO but if you
> reassign it (eg. curruser = u) then it becomes something else which is not
> an ASO.
>
> Your code looks like it's a mod of JumpStart, but JumpStart actually does
> the same kind of thing Fernando's saying:
>
>        @ApplicationState
>        private Visit _visit;
>        private boolean _visitExists;
>
> <snipped>
>
>        User user = getSecurityFinderService().authenticateUser(_loginId,
> _password);
>
>        // Store the user in the Visit
>
>        _visit.noteLogIn(user);
>
> and Visit then sets its fields based on the user. That way it remains an
> ASO.
>
>        public void noteLogIn(User user) {
>                _loggedIn = true;
>                _myUserId = user.getId();
>                _myLoginId = user.getLoginId();
>        }
>
> HTH,
>
> Geoff
>
>
>
> On 03/09/2008, at 7:24 PM, Fernando Padilla wrote:
>
>  Also, i thought you were to think of an ASO almost as a singleton or a
>> service.  Tapestry will create it for you on first access.  I didn't know
>> you could set it.  Even if I'm wrong, using this design pattern might clean
>> things up a little.
>>
>>
>> So you should use another class to contain a reference to the current
>> active user, call it "UserContainer".
>>
>>
>> @AplicationState
>> private UserContainer currUser;
>>
>>
>> and it would have methods like:
>>
>> currUser.hasUser()
>> currUser.setUser(User user)
>> currUser.getUser()
>>
>>
>> or whatever you like.
>>
>>
>>
>> José Paumard wrote:
>>
>>> Natia,
>>> I think there is a mistake in your code :
>>> private User currUser ;
>>> private boolean userExists ;
>>> I dont think T5 will link userExists and currUser, currUser should be
>>> named user, or userExists currUserExists (please correct me if I'm wrong).
>>> That said, what do you mean "I cant access currUser", do you mean that
>>> the ASO is null in other classes that want to read it ? Or do you mean that
>>> userExists is always false (which is normal, see above).
>>> José
>>> Natia Gdzelishvili a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I'm using tapestry 5.0.14 ,i vahe problem with aso, my code is:
>>>>
>>>> public class Login {
>>>>   private String username;
>>>>   private String password;
>>>>   @Inject
>>>>   private IBusinessServicesLocator _businessServicesLocator;
>>>>   @ApplicationState
>>>>   private User currUser;
>>>>   private boolean userExists;
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   public String getUsername() {
>>>>       return username;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   public void setUsername(String username) {
>>>>       this.username = username;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   public String getPassword() {
>>>>       return password;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   public void setPassword(String password) {
>>>>       this.password = password;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
>>>>   @OnEvent(value = "submit", component = "loginForm")
>>>>   public Object submitLoginForm() {
>>>>       Class nextPage;
>>>>       try {
>>>>           User u=getMerchantCreator().login(username, password);
>>>> //*returns
>>>> some object*
>>>>           currUser = u; /*/ currUser object cannot be resolved*
>>>>           nextPage = ViewAllMerchants.class;
>>>>
>>>>       } catch (UserNotFoundException e) {
>>>>           nextPage = Login.class;
>>>>           e.printStackTrace();
>>>>       }
>>>>       return nextPage;
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   private IMerchantCreatorLocal getMerchantCreator() {
>>>>       return _businessServicesLocator.getMerchantCreatorLocal();
>>>>   }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> i cannot access curruser...
>>>> please help..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to