I read the source code and it seems that the @CommitAfter really is used to
mark the method and then each method is decorated: thus each method call
gets committed separately. Am I right?
-99
9902468 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to understand how transactions should be handled with the
> @CommitAfter annotation.
>
> I have a normal service interface (FormDAO) that is annotated with commit
> afters, but what happens when
>
> Pseudo code:
> void onSave() {
>
> formDAO.saveForm(form);
> formDAO.updateValues(form, user);
>
> }
>
> and the later call to formDAO throws an exception? Is the first method's
> transaction also rolled back, even if both methods have their own
> @CommitAfter annotations?
>
> The documentation doesn't specify whether the transaction is rolled back
> if there is one successfull @CommitAfter and one failed.
>
> Is the correct approach to wrap multiple service calls in to one and
> annotate only this?
>
> -99
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5---Hibernate---Transaction-confusion-tp18826235p18826733.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
