Hi all,

as a quick follow up on the client side validation issue in T 4.1.1 I posted
earlier, I've just upgraded to T 4.1.5, which seems to have solved the
problem.

Nils

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Nils Preusker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Hi all, I ran into a strange problem with client side validation in
> tapestry 4.1.1. When I use the number translator and enable client side
> validation in a form with an integer value and I enter a value larger than
> 999, I get the error message "SomeInt must be a numeric value.". After some
> debugging, I noticed that for some reason the validation profile that
> tapestry assigns to the form uses dojo.validate.isRealNumber. I compared the
> results of isRealNumber with the ones of isReal by setting up a simple html
> form and manually assigning validation profiles to it (as described at
> http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/javascript/form.html). The result
> was that isReal only returned errors when the input really isn't numeric,
> while isRealNumber also treats numbers larger than 999 as non-numeric.
>
> I concluded that a quick fix for this problem would be to override the
> validation profile to force dojo to use isReal instead of is RealNumber. The
> example on the t4 website (see link above) only uses a plain HTML form, so
> no profiles are assigned by tapestry. As soon as I add jwcids to the form
> though, the custom java script is overwritten and the profiles that I try to
> assign manually are omitted. Does anyone have an idea how to solve this?
>
> I'd also be interested to find the initial cause of the problem. How does
> t4 decide which validation profile to use? Coming to think of it, wouldn't
> it be possible to validate the basic Java types implicitly, without having
> to specify additional translators or validators? It seems odd to me that it
> is neccessary to specify a number translator to avoid exceptions when a user
> enters e.g. characters and min/max validators to avoid overflows. After all,
> tapestry is aware of the data type of the variables the values in the forms
> are bound to. Am I missing something here..?
>
> Cheers, Nils
>
>


-- 
------------------------
Nils Preusker
Juliusstraat 69
NL-5621 GC Eindhoven
Mobil (DE): +49 (0)178 - 85 00 566
Mobil (NL): +31 (0)6 - 18 91 36 91
www.nilspreusker.de
------------------------

Reply via email to