thanx for info 2008/5/7 Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I adopted the leading underscores style a long time ago, when using > Eclipse. It helped with completion (Eclipse was very slow at this, > back in the day). > > However, seeing that in code has "scared" people, since its unusual. > > Next: Hibernate is not as flexible as Tapestry, and leading > underscores confuse it (when you apply annotations directly to > fields). I don't want some of my code following one convention, some > following another. > > Further, I'm using some some Groovy now, maybe some Scala in the > future. And often, I'm using final variables from inner classes. The > underscores become increasingly chancy there. > > So I don't want underscores in the tutorials and examples, and I want > to be consistent. > > Its not a big deal, lots of meaningless changes ... to > implementations. No backwards compatibility issues. Underscores will > continue to be allowed (and stripped out as necessary). I'll leave a > number of underscored fields in the integration test suite. > > > > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Sven Homburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > hi howard, > > > > what is the reason removing the variables leading underscores? > > > > > > -- > > with regards > > Sven Homburg > > http://tapestry5-components.googlecode.com > > > > > > -- > Howard M. Lewis Ship > > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- with regards Sven Homburg http://tapestry5-components.googlecode.com
