It's something of a bootstrapping issue, where @Match is more "fundamental" than symbols. It might be technically possible.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:02 AM, THIEBAUD Patrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are going to use Tapestry 5 for a ligthweight framework and provide > some added-value for example in terms of automatic JTA transaction > managment through a decorator. > According to the documentation of the Match annotation, it is not > possible to use symbols for its value. > If it were the case, we could simply provide a compiled module class > including this decorator (and others), letting the project configure the > target services by configuring the ApplicationDefaults service with a > published symbol name. > > Is it intended in the future to support symbols with the Match > annotation ? > Or is it already the case ? > > Thanks in advance. > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
