There is another approach to testing where javascript is on the client, that is to use htmlunit. HtmlUnit is great, but it can be a big effort to get it going. I came to it via PushToTest. PushToTest wraps up a lot of things and basically relies on HtmlUnit 1.13 I think, along with a patch. In the environment I was testing this seemed to work whereas HtmlUnit 1.14 didn't. But I found I wasn't realy interested in PushToTest and simply circumvented it, building my own tests in JUnit. I was able to use JUnit 4. and it is useful to look at the tests in HtmlUnit to get going. Basically you need the webclient and htmlpage and your away. HtmlUnit wraps the Dom in each of its objects. I don't know how this would fit with tapestry-test as haven't looked at this at all. Not doubt will have to if next project adopts tapestry! Main thing, HtmlUnit is a very good api for working with the dom, includes fairly comprehensive javascript support which is increasing as attention is being paid to this aspect, and allows setting the whole thing up within JUnit using usual fixtures, etc. It simulates a browser. so its approach is completely different to selenium. PushToTest has some macro recording facility, but it is that I ended up not wanting to use, preferring everything in code approach. Remember, in code you can use mocking so there is far greater flexibility that there is using macros, in my opinion. HTH, Adam
On 20/03/2008, Mark W. Shead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I scoured OpenQA's forums and I tried those methods before posting > here. I figured someone using tapestry-test may have already solved > the problem already. > > The solutions that look like they would work involve invoking > javascript, but it doesn't look like this is possible through tapestry- > test. > > > Mark > > > On Mar 20, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Josh Canfield wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > This is more of a Selenium/FCKeditor or Selenium/TinyMCE question... > > > > Have you seen this? > > http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?messageID=21845 > > or > > http://forums.openqa.org/thread.jspa?messageID=20341 > > > > Josh > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Mark W. Shead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> The Tapestry testing capabilities are really great. I'm having good > >> luck with everything except for dealing with WYSIWYG text areas. I > >> can't seem to get Selenium to fill these in. I've tried both TinyMCE > >> and FCKeditor. > >> > >> Has anyone found a way to do this? > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > -- > > TheDailyTube.com. Sign up and get the best new videos on the internet > > delivered fresh to your inbox. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
