havent tried myself, but it should work this way... you could create a Dispatcher and inject the Request service. by analyzing the http headers you can determine the client and set the content-type of the response accordingly
g, kris Christian Gorbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07.03.2008 09:43 Bitte antworten an "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org> An Tapestry users <users@tapestry.apache.org> Kopie Thema T5: Response Content Type, Web Standards and IE hi group, I'm trying to achive to let T5 server xhtml valid pages. This seems to be easy, because T5 uses a DOM (this is really great) and different markup writers can render out different markup styles (e.g. html vs xhtml). The html markup writer is the default markup writer, to use a xml writer you can add a @ContentType annotation to your page(s). http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/: <quote> 'application/xhtml+xml' SHOULD be used for serving XHTML documents to XHTML user agents. Authors who wish to support both XHTML and HTML user agents MAY utilize content negotiation by serving HTML documents as 'text/html' and XHTML documents as 'application/xhtml+xml'. Also note that it is not necessary for XHTML documents served as 'application/xhtml+xml' to follow the HTML Compatibility Guidelines. </quote> BUT: @ContentType("application/xhtml+xml") is only respected by Mozilla Browsers. IE doesnt know how to handle responses of this content type. Same behavior for "text/xml". Content negotation also isn't an option, because the annotation is too static and applies to all user agents. For IE et al. my markup should be rendered as valid xhtml and the content type should be classic "text/html". Any ideas how to choose the xml markup writer in conjunction with response content type "text/html"? tia & best regards c)hristian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
