True, i didn't think of that. It would be much easier to store the Link object thought....
Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > That won't cluster since LinkImpl is not serializable ... I'll have to > check to see if it can be made serializable. If not, you certainly > can store the absolute URI from the Link as a persistent property. > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Josh Canfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Hugo, >> >> I'm not familiar with ICallback, but it sounds like what you are trying to >> do matches something I use to keep track of the referring page within my >> application. >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-page-navigation-%28return-to-arbitrary-page%29-p14155874.html >> >> Essentially you create the Link object and stick it in a @Persist'd >> attribute of the page. >> >> Josh >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> Maybe i'm missing something but i'm not seeing an easy way to solve this. >>> >> > Well, in it's simplest form i can just pass a page name to the >> > activation context of the redirection target page and then use that >> > String value to return to the original page. Works fine. >> > >> > But, a little more complex use case. What if i want to keep the >> > activation context from the original page ? >> > My first take at this was to instead of passing a String to the >> > redirection target page i would pass a Link instance that i would build. >> > That doesn't work because Tapestry can't coerce Link objects. >> > Second take, i will pass the result of the toURI method of the generated >> > Link. Now the problem is, how do i perform de redirect ? The passed >> > string isn't a page name so i can't just return it. I can't also seem to >> > find a way to build the a new Link object from the given string. >> > >> > Am i missing something here ? >> > >> > Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> > > Yes, the passivate/activate events fill similar roles to ICallback. >> > > There is no exact analog, but that's because you can build your own so >> > > easily on top of the passivate and activate events. >> > > >> > > On Nov 8, 2007 5:40 AM, Stephane Decleire >> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > >> I'm trying to migrate an application which use ICallback from Tap 4.1.3 >> > >> to Tap 5.0.6 >> > >> Is there an equivalent to the callback notion in Tap 5 ? >> > >> If not, does anybody know a way to implement such a mechanism ? >> > >> >> > >> Thanks in advance. >> > >> >> > >> Stephane >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> -- >> TheDailyTube.com. Sign up and get the best new videos on the internet >> delivered fresh to your inbox. >> >> > > > >