Joseph Kobe wrote:
>
> Ok Howard, thanks for your private mail to me clarifying my concerns about
> Tapestry 6, upcoming in 4th quater of 2008. I must be honest and open,
> hence my reply via this medium, that I disagree with you about rewriting
> Tapestry yet again from scratch and again not being backward compatible
> with Tapestry 5. Can't you please make Tap 6 be backward compatible with
> Tap 5 and it's predecessors? I also didn't agree with you on your points
> on Ruby on rails. Could you please clarify for the whole list to
> understand?Thanks,Joseph
> _________________________________________________________________
> Bekijk Yes-R's real life soap op MSN Video!
> http://video.msn.com/video.aspx?mkt=nl-nl&tab=m1192527562294&vid=8aff5b76-b78d-4b55-8b64-ef7e1d73aab2&playlist=videoByUuids:uuids:50b732c2-c105-41e9-adf0-36bd627d4eaa,0813da8c-031b-423f-a79d-35d925aee805,5cce447e-948d-43af-9862-45bb6bb9d6d8,6a39138c-f562-4254-be70-9d93343650f8,f9b8d78f-05a4-4c74-8e4b-28d20a4037ab&from=NLNL_Yes-R
>
If it's true...it's too horrible
I thought T5 is layering ground for future versions..
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tapestry-6-tp15535784p15541149.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
