I agree. That's why i created this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2143
Renat Zubairov wrote: > Thank you, Hugo for the help. I was also checking the T5 documentation and > found that default (recommended) way for email validation > is roll-your-own validation based on the regular expressions that are stored > inside properties. > This is really, really innovative and unusual way to do that for me > (although I'm a T4 user) because: > > 1. Properties/Resources bundle are used for externationalization of the > strings/resources and not for defining validation rules, storing regular > expression in properties is abnormal way to achieve validation, as a new T5 > user I will never look to the properties file for validation rules. > > 2. Email validation rules are the same for all languages therefore using DRY > we shall put it only in one resource bundle, however inconsistent properties > in resource bundles is a bad sign and with some validation rules it could > even lead to the broken build. > > 3. Although I think having different validation rules for different > languages is a very good idea and might be useful but IMHO you aren't gonna > need it in the most of the cases. > > I think we need a specific email validator that can be optionally > parametrized by the key of the error message. > > Renat > > On 11/02/2008, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This thread should help you: >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tapestry.apache.org/msg20213.html >> >> Renat Zubairov wrote: >> >>> Hello T5 users, >>> What is the default approach of handling email validation inside the >>> form/beanEditForm? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > >
